志木街づくり株式会社
Saitama, Japan
Active| Registration number | T1030001152258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Corporation |
| Registered name | 志木街づくり株式会社 |
| Address | 埼玉県志木市本町５丁目２４番２１号 5-24-21 Honcho, Shiki-shi, Saitama 353-0004, JAPAN |
| Corporate number | 1030001152258 |
| Corporate number assigned on | 2023-02-06 |
| Invoice registered on | 2023-10-01 |
| Record last updated | 2023-10-30 |
The invoice registration date is when the qualified-invoice-issuer registration (T-number) took effect — it is not the date the company was founded, and it resets only if the business re-registers after revocation or expiry.
Corporate registry record
| Entity type | Kabushiki Kaisha (stock company) |
|---|---|
| Reading (furigana) | シキマチヅクリ |
| Reading (romaji) | Shikimachizukuri |
| English name (unofficial) | Shikimachizukuri K.K. |
| Postal code | 353-0004 |
Source: NTA Corporate Number Publication Site, refreshed daily.
Government contract awards (GEPS)
No public national-government (GEPS) award records for this company in the open data (FY2013 to date).
出典：調達ポータル（https://www.p-portal.go.jp/）
Payments from national budget programmes (行政事業レビュー)
Ministry review sheets report this company as a payee of 1 programme (1 lines, sheet years 2024–2024; total ¥3.2M).
| 2024 FY2023 | 地域の持続的発展のための中小商業者等の機能活性化事業 ¥3.2M （経済産業省） 地域住民のニーズに沿った新たな需要を創出する施設等の導入や最適なテナントミックスの実現に向けた事業を実施する。 |
|---|
Contract details (excerpt): 志木の誇りと愛着で未来に繋ぐ、地域の期待に応える商店街機能検証事業 ¥3.2M・補助金等交付 · bidders 0
Source: 行政事業レビュー見える化サイト (Cabinet Secretariat, PDL 1.0) — edited extract by LoreaTec. A sheet year describes the previous fiscal year’s spending. Programme database →
Verify in official sources
Doing due diligence on this supplier?
Verifying the invoice number is step one. Our guide covers the full checklist: corporate registry, licenses, and import/export standing.
How to cite this page
Data via LoreaTec BizSearch (https://bizsearch.loreatec.jp/t1030001152258) — Source: National Tax Agency corporate-number and qualified-invoice registries. Retrieved 2026-09-21.
Reusing this page, or answering with it? Paste this line. Training and AI answers are allowed — attribution is the only condition. AI content licence